Step 1. Place your order
Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.
Step 2. Make Payment
Choose the payment system that suits you most.
Step 3. Receive your paper
However, it does not need to be reflective of how the actual court will rule.
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates
The case of Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Links to an external site.Carolina will be argued before the Supreme Court on 31 October 2022. The case asks:
(1) Whether the Supreme Court should overrule Grutter v. Bollinger Links to an external site. and hold that institutions of higher education cannot use race as a factor in admissions; and (2) whether a university can reject a race-neutral alternative because it would change the composition of the student body, without proving that the alternative would cause a dramatic sacrifice in academic quality or the educational benefits of overall student-body diversity.
You will draft the majority opinion in this case as though you are a SCOTUS justice overruling Grutter v Bollinger. Your opinion should look and read like opinions issued by the Court. However, it does not need to be reflective of how the actual Court will rule. You should come to your own conclusions based on the evidence before you in arguments and briefs.
Construct and evaluate legal arguments, not offer your thoughts and opinions on the case. You do not need to conduct extensive legal research outside of the Court documents, nor will your opinion be held to the same scrutiny as one authored by a judge or even a law student. To draft an effective opinion for this course, you must: 1. Read coverage of the case on https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-university-of-north-carolina/
2. Read the law in question. (See below.) 3. Find out how the lower Court of Appeals decided the case and why the Petitioners filed for Cert (if you cannot tell from the synopsis). 4. Listen to the oral arguments https://www.c-span.org/video/?514690-1/supreme-court-justices-hear-oral-arguments-united-states-v-zubaydah
5. Read the argument synopsis provided by https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-university-of-north-carolina/
6. Skim the petitioner and respondent briefs https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-university-of-north-carolina/ for the essential arguments. 7. Skim the amicus briefs from various partieshttps://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-university-of-north-carolina/
8. Decide how you would rule on the case, noting the legal reasoning and interpretation schools you used to form your theory of the case, in this case, overruling Grutter v. Bollinger
Standards for Submission Opinions should be professional in tone and writing quality. They should be no longer than 6 pages (excluding citations), 1.5/double spaced, in an 11pt or 12pt standard serif or sans-serif font (such as Times New Roman, Helvetica, Verdana, Arial, etc.) with 1″ margins. Page numbers should appear at the bottom of every page.
Any citations used must be in APA, APSA, or Chicago Manual. Citations may be interlinear, footnote, or endnote, but you must have citations throughout the paper (for all material quoted or paraphrased) not just an end bibliography or works cited page. You do not need to cite the timestamp within the oral arguments. No cover pages. No works cited pages. Resources:
Only pay once! Clear pricing system with no hidden fees, direct line to your writer, 24/7 customer support.
Our reputation is built on delivering top-quality papers. No matter how small the task, we give customers our best.
Missed due dates can result in a serious loss of marks. We strive to finish everything with time to spare.